GLOBAL WRONGNESS ADVISORY

Client Instrument · Standard WD-27

The Wrongness Diagnostic™

A structured assessment of how wrong you currently are, benchmarked against executives who were also wrong, but with more conviction.

Ten sections. One decimal place. Results are final, printable, and benchmarked. Average completion time: 4 minutes. Average time spent disputing results: 3 weeks.

Instrument WD-27 · Self-Administered

Before You Begin

The Wrongness Diagnostic™ is a structured, ten-section assessment of executive wrongness. Your responses are benchmarked against a proprietary panel of executives who were also wrong. There are no correct answers. This has been verified.

  • Estimated completion time: 4 minutes. Estimated time disputing the results: 3 weeks.
  • The methodology is proprietary and will not be disclosed, particularly to participants.
  • Results are final. Retaking the Diagnostic is permitted and does not help.
  • If you feel your ready, that feeling has been recorded.

By beginning, you accept our findings, whatever they turn out to be. No refunds.

Instrument WD-27 was approved by our Assessment Standards Committee, which has never met.

Methodology

Scored to One Decimal. Explained to No One.

The Diagnostic is scored using a proprietary methodology we do not disclose, principally because disclosure has never survived contact with it. It has been validated against itself and found consistent. Their is no appeals process.

Outcome Levels

Level ISituationally Incorrect
Level IIOperationally Wrong
Level IIIStrategically Compromised
Level IVInstitutionally Incorrect
Level VEnterprise Grade Wrongness
Level VIBeyond Advisory Recovery

Each response is weighted against our benchmark panel: 14,000 professionals, 40 countries, one direction. All four responses to every question are wrong. This is not a limitation of the instrument. It is the finding.

Participants who identify the pattern are scored for pattern recognition, which is billed as a separate engagement.

An executive reviewing assessment results with visible concern
Fig. 1 — A client reviews his dossier. His dispute was noted, then scored.